AboutServicesTechnologiesWorkCareersGet in touch
← All departmentsDepartment

Cloud & DevOps

Infrastructure that scales with the product, not against it.

What this department covers

Infrastructure problems rarely show up on day one — they show up the day traffic doubles, or a deploy takes down production, or nobody on the team can explain how the current setup actually works. We build cloud infrastructure and CI/CD pipelines meant to survive that day: reproducible deployments, monitoring that tells you what broke before a customer does, and an architecture that scales by changing a config, not by a rewrite. That work spans AWS, GCP, and Azure, and it's the same infrastructure discipline whether it's supporting a web app, a mobile backend, or a real-time telemetry pipeline from our drone and robotics work.

A lot of what we get called in for isn't a greenfield setup — it's an existing system where deploys are manual and stressful, nobody's quite sure what happens if a particular service goes down, and 'infrastructure as code' is aspirational rather than actual. Fixing that doesn't usually require a rewrite. It requires making the existing setup reproducible, observable, and boring in the way infrastructure is supposed to be boring — so a deploy is a routine event instead of one everyone quietly dreads.

Where this shows up

Cloud architecture & migration

Designing or migrating infrastructure on AWS, GCP, or Azure built to scale with the product.

CI/CD pipelines

Automated build, test, and deployment pipelines that make shipping routine instead of risky.

Monitoring & reliability

Observability and alerting so failures are caught before they become outages.

Infrastructure for real-time systems

The event-driven, queue-backed infrastructure (Lambda, SQS, SNS) that our drone, robotics, and live-tracking work depends on.

Infrastructure audits

Reviewing an existing setup to find the single points of failure and manual steps that are one bad day away from becoming an outage.

Cost optimization

Right-sizing infrastructure that's over-provisioned or paying for idle capacity, without sacrificing the reliability the system actually needs.

Built on infrastructure made for real-time data

AWS

Lambda, DynamoDB, SQS, SNS, and API Gateway — our default for event-driven and real-time infrastructure.

GCP

Used where the rest of a client's stack already lives there, or where specific services fit better.

Azure

Same — matched to existing client infrastructure rather than forced by default.

CI/CD tooling

Automated pipelines from commit to deploy, built to catch problems before they ship.

Infrastructure as code

Reproducible environments defined in code rather than manual console configuration nobody can fully reconstruct.

Client work in this department

Most infrastructure work we do isn't glamorous, and that's kind of the point — the goal is for deploys, scaling, and incident response to be boring, predictable events instead of the thing that quietly worries a team every time it happens. That's especially true for the real-time, event-driven infrastructure behind our drone, robotics, and live-tracking work, where a dropped queue message or a silent failure isn't just an inconvenience, it's a fleet operator missing a telemetry alert they needed.

Common questions

Which cloud provider do you recommend?
Depends on your existing stack and requirements — we don't default to one provider regardless of fit.
Can you take over infrastructure someone else built?
Yes — auditing and improving an existing setup is common work, not just greenfield builds.
Do you handle ongoing infrastructure support, or just the initial setup?
Both — ongoing support and monitoring is part of most engagements, not a one-time handoff.
Is this only relevant for large-scale systems?
No — reproducible deploys and basic monitoring matter at almost any scale; the earlier they're in place, the less painful scaling up becomes later.
Can you reduce our current cloud bill?
Often, yes — over-provisioned resources and idle capacity are common, and an infrastructure audit usually surfaces cost savings alongside reliability improvements.
Do you set up monitoring and alerting, or just the infrastructure?
Both — infrastructure without monitoring just moves the point of failure somewhere less visible, so alerting is part of the initial setup, not an afterthought added later.
Can you support a team that already has some DevOps in place?
Yes — most engagements build on an existing setup rather than replacing it, extending what already works and fixing the specific gaps that are causing problems.
Do you provide on-call or incident-response support?
That's scoped per engagement — some clients want ongoing on-call coverage, others just want the infrastructure and alerting set up so their own team can respond.

Have a project in mind?

Tell us about it, and we'll scope the software around it.

Start a project →